The Justice Department informed a federal court of appeals that they believe a separate judge’s decision in a marijuana-and gun-rights case “was incorrectly decided”, as it sought a favorable ruling in a lawsuit related to the matter.
In a brief of one page filed on Friday, federal officials informed judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals of the Eleventh Circuit of the recent ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals of the Fifth Circuit declaring the law prohibiting cannabis consumers from purchasing or possessing firearms unconstitutional.
DOJ contests that decision, which also has relevance to a case that is being considered by the Eleventh Circuit. The suit was originally filed by Nikki Fried, former Florida Agriculture commissioner (D). It is more specific and concerns the right of medical cannabis patients registered with the state to own firearms. However, the structure of the case remains the same.
The Justice Department, which has scheduled oral arguments for next month on the Florida case said that the separate ruling made last week “differs from numerous circuit and district courts decisions upholding SS (922(g)(3)’s constitutionality”.
It said that Daniels deviated from these precedents by relying on the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision in United States V. Rahimi. In this case, the Supreme Court granted the government’s petition for certiorari, which was a case wherein the court held that laws prohibiting domestic violence victims from owning guns were unconstitutional.
The Justice Department stated that “for the reasons given in government’s brief, Daniels is incorrectly determined and SS 922 (g)(3) conforms to the Second Amendment.”
A Florida medical cannabis patient’s attorney told Marijuana Moment Friday that, “we have reviewed [the Fifth Circuit] decision and we will be ready to address it during oral argument.”
A number of courts have challenged the federal ban on firearms for cannabis users. The Fifth Circuit, the strongest court in the country to declare this prohibition unconstitutional has been joined by two federal district courts.
The main argument is based on a U.S. Supreme Court decision last year, which stated that any restrictions on firearms must be in line with the original context of the Second Amendment ratification in 1791.
The Fifth Circuit in its decision last Friday said that the government had failed to argue effectively that the ban is a meaningful historical analogue. It dismissed its position that gun restriction imposed on mentally ill and “dangerous”, and actively drunk individuals in the late 1800s and early 1900s met the high standard established by the Supreme Court’s action.
The Fifth Circuit’s decision makes the ban illegal in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas for the time being. Eleventh Circuit has jurisdiction in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia. If the Eleventh Circuit ultimately affirms the constitutionality, it will set up the Supreme Court’s intervention in the case of conflicting circuit rulings.
Attorneys for President Joe Biden’s son Hunter, who has been accused of buying a firearm in 2018, at a time he disclosed that he had used crack cocaine, have cited the previous ruling of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, which found the firearms prohibition for marijuana users unconstitutional. They argue that this applies to their case, as well. The Justice Department has appealed the district court’s ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals of the Tenth Circuit.
In this federal case, the judge dismissed an indictment filed against a man in 2022 who was charged with violating the law after police found cannabis and a gun in his car during a traffic check. The court ruled that the law prohibiting “illegal” marijuana users from owning firearms was also in violation of the Second Amendment.
A judge in the U.S. District Court for Western District of Texas ruled that law prohibiting the transfer and sale of guns by people who use marijuana was also unconstitutional.
Marijuana Moment tracks more than 1,000 cannabis and drug policy bills that have been introduced in state legislatures, and Congress. Patreon supporters who pledge at least $25/month gain access to our interactive charts, maps and hearing calendar.
Discover more about our marijuana bills tracker. Become a Patreon supporter to gain access.
—
The U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives has maintained, despite recent rulings, that the prohibition on marijuana firearms is clear and enforceable, even in states where the drug has been legalized.
issued a warning shortly after Minnesota’s Governor signed into law a legalization measure in May. The agency reminded that cannabis users are prohibited from purchasing or possessing firearms and ammunition until the federal prohibition is lifted.
ATF will issue an advisory in 2020 that specifically targets Michigan and requires gun sellers conduct federal background checks for all unlicensed buyers. It said Michigan’s cannabis laws allowed “habitual marijuana consumers” and other disqualified persons to obtain firearms without a license.
Recently updated its cannabis employment policy, despite ATF’s insistence that it must enforce this ban.
The update make it so applicants who’ve grown, manufactured or sold marijuana in compliance with state laws while serving in a “position of public responsibility” will no longer be automatically disqualified–whereas those who did so in violation of state cannabis policies won’t be considered.
Two Republican members of Congress have introduced two bills in this session, focusing on marijuana and gun policy.
Rep. Brian Mast, co-chairman of the Congressional Cannabis Caucus and a member of the House of Representatives, introduced legislation in May that would protect the Second Amendment right of marijuana users in states where the drug is legal. This would allow them to buy and possess firearms, which they are currently prohibited to have under federal law.
Mast is also co-sponsoring in this session a separate Bill from Rep. Alex Mooney (R-WV), which would allow medical marijuana patients to buy and possess firearms.
A law passed in Arkansas earlier this month clarifies that medical cannabis patients are eligible to obtain concealed carry permits for firearms.
Below you will find the latest brief from the federal government in the marijuana and firearm rights case:
Oregon Gov. Vetoes Bill to Study Creating Public Bank that Could Service Marijuana Businesses
The post DOJ says Federal Appeals Court ruled ‘incorrectly’ that gun ban for marijuana consumers is unconstitutional first appeared on Marijuana moment.
